Self-evaluation
The advert
that was chosen to be made was for a product called ‘Choc-o-lait’, which is a
luxuriously smooth hot chocolate drink that you can lay back and drift into
heaven with. The tag line was ’luxuriously smooth lay back and indulge yourself
in heaven’. The concept for the advert was to follow a couple walking their dog
through a park, but, they had had an argument and were looking really moody
with each other. Then they sit down on a
bench, the boyfriend pours out some hot chocolate and the girlfriend looks at
him jealously as he is sipping the drink and so he offers her some. She sips it, then they both become happier
and put their heads together and cuddle as if the hot chocolate has made everything
better again.
The unique
selling point to the product is that it is deliciously smooth and gives the
consumer the indulgence of being able to relax and enjoy the drink and it has
the potential to make your day that much better.
The advert I
feel did not quite fit its purpose of successfully promoting the product as it
was not the advert that I had designed and I had no say in how it was planned. I feel the advert was successful in selling
the dream, however, it doesn’t show the product very well at all
with the whole way the advert was
planned and located should have changes with maybe showing the couple getting
in from a busy day at work and cuddling up on the sofa drinking the hot
chocolate. I feel that this would have made the purpose of the product more
visible and easier to understand. However,
it is still understandable in the fact that it is portraying that it doesn’t
matter if you get into an argument with the one you love, give them Choc-o-lait
and they will forgive you.
with the whole way the advert was
planned and located should have changes with maybe showing the couple getting
in from a busy day at work and cuddling up on the sofa drinking the hot
chocolate. I feel that this would have made the purpose of the product more
visible and easier to understand. However,
it is still understandable in the fact that it is portraying that it doesn’t
matter if you get into an argument with the one you love, give them Choc-o-lait
and they will forgive you.
However, we
had to edit the video clip as we did not actually add the product logo into the
advert so I added it into the end shot of the flask to clarify what the product
actually is. This was not ideal and didn’t
promote the product very well which to no fault of my own due to the fact that it
was not my advert and so had no part in the concept planning.
I feel the
tag line saves the advert somewhat as it clearly gives a good description of
what the advert is about, with the extra lines of dialogue being ‘don’t break
your heart’ at the end to signify the whole point of the advert. Also emphasising that if you don’t want to
get a broken heart then you should get the product so that this doesn’t happen.
Next time,
learning from my mistakes, I would have made the logo and stuck it onto the
actual flask in the production process meaning that in the pre-production stage
we could have planned the filming out more efficiently but this I have learnt
and can bear in mind for future projects.
I think the
concept of the advert is very appropriate for the audience in this day and age
as everyone wants to improve their lives and will try different products to
help with this. For instance, consumers who buy toothpaste to make their breath
smell fresher and teeth whiter think that this will help them feel better about
themselves and improve their self-esteem. With the aim of advertising the restorative
magic that comes with buying these products with the sale of the ‘dream’.

Compared to the original intentions
that the group decided on, the final product became very similar to the
original concept thought of. Our initial intentions were to have a couple
walking through a park walking their dog and looking as if they had had an
argument they sit down on a bench and drink the hot chocolate and then
everything is better. This is exactly
what we portrayed in all stages of the process with the only big differences
being in the shots we were going to use.
It ended up with us using fewer shots so that in the editing suite we
would have less to work with. The time limit
was only 30-50 seconds and in the editing suite I had to seriously cut scenes
to get within that time zone. However, I have kept the initial concept and it
is still very much linked to the original idea as I said above with the couple
walking the dog and the bench scene.
The effectiveness of the content; although we had to cut out a few
scenes, because of time constraints in the editing suite, the advert still
successfully promotes its purpose as it still shows how the product is supposed
to work and is still connected to the original brief we had been given.
The
technical quality of the advert, such as the camera shots, focus, lighting and the
mise en scene I think was executed well as
the shots were all framed and shot very well as we all made sure that
the shot was framed properly before the shot was taken. The only thing that I
think we could have looked out for more was the lighting as we did get glare
from the sun in a few of the shots. We should
have looked for this at the time and that is something to bear in mind for future
projects.
I think this is particularly well
framed as it is showing the male and the fact that the girl is still ignoring
him also gives another layer to the narrative.
Aesthetically the location that we
chose to film in was Dane John Gardens which is a very beautiful park that we
thought would be perfect for the makeup scene as everything is supposed to go
from being dreary, grey and dull to full of life, love and colour. This is why
I have put three quarters of the advert in black and white as this is then also
telling us that the scene is supposed to look depressing and cold, I did this
as I thought the rushes were to full of colour and needed dulling down as the
day we chose to film was not a particularly dreary day. Furthermore the couple aren’t the usual couple
you would see in an advert as the two actors aren’t aesthetically pleasing to
the eye to most people and by using a ‘bigger’ couple could get complaints as
they don’t look the healthiest, this could get negative ‘niggles’ from the
audience so we should also consider our casting better before filming. Along with this the fact that we used a breed
of dog, the Staffordshire bull terrier, which could also be seen as controversial
and could also get negative feedback. N
ot everyone likes the breed because
of their reputation however we tried to make her look as ‘cute ‘ as possible by
putting her in a costume and showing the ‘good’ side to the breed as she was
being very affectionate towards the female actor and had her tail wagging the whole time showing her as a ‘softy’. This could also gave a positive effect on the
breed itself if they were featured in more products such as this advert as they
get a very bad press because of the minority of bad owners who badly train the
dogs. ‘They're
being dumped in record numbers and branded a "yob dog", yet
Staffordshire bull terriers are ideal family pets, say experts. So why is this
nation of dog lovers turning against them?’[1]
Going back to task 2 for the pre-production planning
pack, the advert has veered slightly in the shots that were portraying in the
story board, as we had a lot more wide shots and close ups of the single
characters showing more of their expressions, however in the production process
we thought that it would be equally clear as of the message we were trying to
get across. As we used long and medium shots as well as a few over the shoulder
shots and took less time to edit them so that I could concentrate more on how
the advert looks without having to do complex editing to make it look good.
As
well as the storyboards the mood board can also be seen in the advert as we
have kept the main concept of the advert with the couple arguing and the whole
walking of the dog in Dane John Gardens.
No comments:
Post a Comment